Continuous Science Foundation Workshop — Banff 2025

Shaping the future of scientific communication through Stories, Values, and Movement from Banff

Core Values

Identifying our core values and their non-intuitive opposites

After the poetry exercise, we asked participants to define the core values they believe should guide the composable science movement—not as abstract ideals, but as compasses for real decisions. Each person offered a value (e.g. reuse, collaboration, transparency, empowerment) and identified its opposite (e.g. finished, selfishness, gatekeeping, suppression). This exercise surfaced a shared belief that changing how science is built and shared means changing the culture that underpins it.

Why Values Matter in Movement-Building

Values clarify what we stand for—especially when the vision is complex or evolving. In a system as tangled as scientific publishing, values offer a simple, powerful through-line for navigating ambiguity and making trade-offs. They drive alignment across diverse contributors. Movements thrive when people with different roles—researchers, funders, technologists—can rally around shared principles, even if they disagree on methods.

Values guide behavior before systems are in place. Before there are policies, platforms, or standards, values help us act in ways that make the future real—they’re how we prototype the culture we want to build.

What We Learned

There were three themes of values that came out of the discussion and individual work books exercises. We valued collaboration over isolation, openness over control, and empowerment over suppression.

Collaboration over Isolation

The first theme centers on working together—across disciplines, institutions, and power dynamics. Participants called for a shift away from isolated, competitive mindsets toward shared purpose, diverse voices, and collective progress.

ValuesBinary Opposite
TogethernessIndividualism
Community / CommunitarianismSiloed
CollaborativeMonoculture
PluralityFearful
InclusiveAlone

Openness over Control

The second theme illustrated a strong desire to move science out of closed systems and into open, discoverable ecosystems. Participants value transparency, accessibility, and the freedom to explore—and see control, exclusivity, and tradition as barriers to progress.

ValuesBinary Opposite
Open / Free / TransparencyGatekeeping
Accessibility / DiscoverableConstraint
Curiosity / AgencyCovetedness
Community-drivenStatus quo

Empowerment through Reuse

The last theme reflects a shift toward empowering researchers to share earlier, remix freely, and act with ethical clarity and purpose.

ValuesBinary Opposite
ReusableFinished (static)
EmpowermentSuppression
Integrity / ImprovementStagnation
JusticeUnequal / unfair
Continuous Science FoundationContinuous Science Foundation
Tools, standards, and communities for iterative, integrated, collaborative, and continuous science
Content hosted byCurvenote